Special Report · Minnesota

The Flag Fight: What's Actually on the Pole

Why Minnesota changed its flag, who decided, what every symbol means — and why a settled question keeps getting relitigated.

30% approve. 50% disapprove. But 55% of Democrats like the new flag and 2% of Republicans do — a 53-point split on a piece of cloth.

Two valid reasons for change

The imagery on the old seal. The pre-2024 flag was the state seal on a blue field: a white settler plowing in the foreground, a rifle and powder horn against a stump, while a Native man on horseback rides into the distance. The artist's own family described what it meant — Mary Henderson Eastman, wife of seal designer Capt. Seth Eastman, published an 1850 poem describing the land passing “to the white man's grasping hand.” That reading is anchored in documented history: the U.S.–Dakota War of 1862 and the 1863 federal Dakota Expulsion Act, which made it illegal for Dakota people to live in Minnesota and forcibly removed roughly 1,300 of them.

It was, by design standards, a bad flag. A classic “seal on a bedsheet” — illegible at a distance, nearly identical to a dozen other states. The North American Vexillological Association's 2001 survey ranked it 67th of 72 U.S. and Canadian flags.

Old Minnesota state flag, 1957-2024, state seal on a blue field
Old flag (1957–2024)The state seal on blue. Image: Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA).
Old Minnesota state seal showing a settler plowing and a Native man on horseback
The old sealThe imagery at the center of the objection. Image: Wikimedia Commons / MNHS.

The contested part: a 1983 revision turned the rider to face “due south,” and state law later described the figure as representing “the great Indian heritage of Minnesota.” Conservatives cite this to rebut the displacement reading; Native leaders and the commission's Dakota members argued the composition still depicted erasure.

A real commission — sitting on a party-line vote

Here is where the “forced on us” framing gets complicated.

The deliberation was real and public. The 2023 Legislature created the State Emblems Redesign Commission inside the state-government omnibus bill (Laws of Minnesota 2023, Ch. 62). It took 2,128 public flag submissions, held public meetings, narrowed to finalists, and adopted the final design 11–1 on December 19, 2023. The flag became official on Statehood Day, May 11, 2024.

But the authorization wasn't bipartisan. The enabling language passed on the DFL trifecta's votes inside a budget bill, and Republican amendments to require a statewide referendum failed. There was no popular vote — and that absence, more than the design, is what opponents keep returning to.

Who was involved

The 13-member commission drew appointees from the governor, the Secretary of State, the Historical Society, the Indian Affairs Council, and the state's ethnic-affairs councils — plus four non-voting legislators from both parties (DFL Reps. Mike Freiberg and Sen. Mary Kunesh; GOP Rep. Bjorn Olson and Sen. Steve Drazkowski). Republicans had seats at the table; they did not have the votes to force a referendum. The lone “no” on the final design came not from the GOP but from the Council on Minnesotans of African Heritage's appointee.

The timeline

WhenWhat happened
2023Legislature (DFL trifecta) creates the redesign commission. GOP referendum amendments fail.
Dec 19, 2023Commission adopts the new flag, 11–1, from 2,128 public submissions.
Mar 2024Republicans file a suite of bills for a public vote, incl. a constitutional amendment. They go nowhere.
May 11, 2024New flag becomes official on Statehood Day — no statewide popular vote.
2024–2026A dozen-plus cities and four counties vote to keep or revert to the old flag.
Apr 2026House DFLers file HF5077 to dock 10% of local aid from cities flying the old flag. Declared dead.
May 2026A flag-burning video circulates at the GOP convention; Republicans file a fresh three-bill vote package.
Jun 17, 2026Minnesota Poll: 30% approve, 50% disapprove — but voters rank fraud, AI and data centers higher.

Simple shapes, specific meanings

New Minnesota state flag, adopted 2024: dark blue state shape, light blue field, white eight-pointed star

The dark blue shape

An abstract outline of Minnesota — the land — also read as the night sky.

The light blue field

The state's water: the Land of 10,000 Lakes, the Mississippi headwaters, and Lake Superior.

The white eight-pointed star

The North Star — the motto L'Étoile du Nord (“Star of the North”). One point faces true north. Its eight-pointed form mirrors the brass star set into the floor of the Capitol rotunda.

Andrew Prekker's original flag submission F1953, with horizontal stripes
The base submission (F1953)Andrew Prekker's original design. The commission swapped his striped field for a solid water-blue and adopted the eight-pointed Capitol star.
The eight-pointed star inlaid in the floor of the Minnesota State Capitol rotunda
The rotunda starThe brass-and-marble star in the Capitol rotunda floor that the flag's star references. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

Praise, “blandness,” and the Somalia claim

Design professionals largely praised it; some of the public found it corporate. And almost immediately, a specific attack spread: that it resembles the Somalia flag.

Why the comparison doesn't hold. Somalia's flag is a solid light-blue field with a single five-pointed white star centered on it. Minnesota's has an asymmetric two-tone field, a navy state-shape, and an eight-pointed star — different layout, different star, different structure. The Secretary of State noted plenty of U.S. flags share palettes with foreign ones (Iowa/France, Texas/Chile) without anyone alleging hidden allegiance.

New Minnesota state flag
MinnesotaTwo-tone field, navy state-shape, eight-pointed star.
Flag of Somalia
SomaliaSolid light-blue field, one centered five-pointed star. Image: Wikimedia Commons.

The designer. The base design came from Andrew Prekker, then 24, of Luverne, with no formal design training; he'd posted an early version in a “Minnesotans for a Better Flag” group before the commission existed. His aim was a clean, modern flag reading instantly as Minnesota — water, land, the North Star. The commission modified it, swapping his striped field for solid water-blue and the eight-pointed Capitol star.

Why a settled question keeps getting relitigated

A flag is cheap, vivid, and emotionally legible. You can put it on a screen in a second; it requires no policy literacy; it lets a candidate signal tribe and grievance without taking a position that costs money or votes. The escalation is visible on both sides: a flag-burning video circulated at the May 2026 GOP convention, and a month earlier House DFLers filed a bill to financially penalize cities flying the old flag. Both are gestures, not governance.

Who's keeping the old flag up

Only the State Capitol is legally required to fly the official flag, so local governments may choose — flying the old one violates no statute.

Counties with resolutions:

Crow Wing (first)
Houston
Nobles
McLeod

Cities flying or reverting to the old flag:

Detroit Lakes
Wadena
Zumbrota
Elk River
Champlin
Byron
Pine Island
St. Francis
North Branch
Plainview
Inver Grove Hts.
Ham Lake
Crosslake
Babbitt
Pequot Lakes
St. Augusta

Elk River acted after ~75% of surveyed residents wanted the former flag. Inver Grove Heights estimated its switch back at about $500. List is illustrative, not exhaustive.

The penalty bill — and the vote that can't pass

In April 2026, eight House DFLers filed HF5077, docking 10% of local aid from any city flying a non-official flag. Lead author Rep. Mike Freiberg — who sat on the redesign commission as a non-voting member — called the cities' moves a “manufactured culture war” and conceded the bill was “not a totally serious proposal.” It has no Senate companion and was declared dead.

On the other side, Republicans have repeatedly tried to put the flag to a vote — a 2024 bill suite (incl. a constitutional amendment) and a 2026 three-bill package backed by Reps. Greg Davids and Marj Fogelman. So “nobody will let us vote” has a wrinkle.

The catch is structural. Minnesota's constitution provides no process for citizen referendums. A binding public vote requires a constitutional amendment. The result is a demand that sounds purely democratic but can be asked for in every session and granted in none. A grievance built that way doesn't get resolved; it gets renewed, and escalated.

The penalty is the anomaly. The referendum isn't.

Historically, the U.S. protected flag defiance — it didn't punish it. After the Civil War there was no penalty for Southern states flying Confederate colors; the First Amendment protects even offensive displays. The notable federal flag action of the era cut the other way: an 1887 order by President Grover Cleveland returned captured Confederate battle flags as a reconciliation gesture. States kept Confederate symbolism in their flags for over a century with no federal penalty — Mississippi didn't remove the battle emblem until 2021. Against that backdrop, docking a city's aid for flying the previous official state flag is the anomaly, not a normal response.

Minnesota's process was real — but not the only model. The flag-change wave is national, and states did it differently:

StateYearHow they did it
Mississippi2020Statewide public referendum — voters approved the new flag.
Utah2024Passed through the Legislature and signed by the governor.
Minnesota2024Appointed commission with public submissions — but no popular vote.

A flag referendum isn't unprecedented — a deep-red Southern state did exactly that. Minnesota's constitution, though, doesn't offer that path without a constitutional amendment first.

The flag is the loudest fight, not the biggest

Star Tribune / KARE 11 / U of M Hubbard School Minnesota Poll · Mason-Dixon · June 8–10, 2026 · n=800 likely voters · ±3.5
Approve of the new state flag, by party
Democrats
55%
Republicans
2%
A 53-point gap. This isn't a design opinion — it's a team marker.
Oppose a new AI data center nearby, by party
Democrats
74%
Republicans
51%
Both majorities oppose. On a real issue, the parties converge.
What voters say they're worried about
Concerned about fraud in state programs
81%
Concerned about AI in daily life
77%
Oppose a new AI data center nearby
63%
Disapprove of the new state flag
50%
The flag (gold) is the lowest-ranked concern in the poll.
Full flag crosstab (tap to expand)
GroupApproveDisapproveNot sure
All305020
Hennepin/Ramsey453025
Rest of metro285319
Southern Minn.186418
Northern Minn.206515
DFL/lean DFL551629
GOP/lean GOP2908
Independent/other265221
Trump voters58410
Harris voters522226
The Star Tribune's prose rounds approval to “a third”; its own results table reports 30%.

What the flag actually does

We can't read anyone's intent, and we don't assert motive. We can put the poll's own numbers next to each other. Voters say they're worried about fraud (81%), AI (77%), and data centers (63% opposed) — material questions, with real money and real decisions in front of the Legislature. On the biggest of them, fraud, the party in power — Democrats — is losing the trust contest, 45% to 38%.

A flag sorts you onto a team whether you realize it or not — that's its political value. A design question that splits the parties 55 to 2 isn't measuring taste; it's measuring affiliation. And notice the one “solution” that gets repeated — let the people vote — is the one Minnesota's constitution leaves structurally blocked. An issue amplified loudly while its resolution is left unreachable is, by its shape, built to sort rather than solve.

The bottom line

The flag was changed through a real, public, deliberative commission process — and a party-line vote that declined to put the question to voters. Both are true. The design means what its makers say: land, water, the North Star. The “Somalia flag” comparison is asserted more than shown. The outrage is genuine in sentiment and largely manufactured in timing.

  1. If your objection is “we never got to vote,” is your fight with the flag — or with the legislators who declined the referendum, whom you can vote on in November?
  2. The poll says you're far more worried about fraud, AI, and data centers than a flag. Which of those is getting the political energy — and which is easier to be loud about?
  3. If the flag fight vanished tomorrow, what would change in your life — and who benefits from making sure it doesn't vanish?

You decide what it means. We just lay out the record.

The flag fight, in brief

Did Minnesotans vote on the new flag?
+

No. The Legislature created an appointed commission, which adopted the design 11–1 after taking 2,128 public submissions. There was no statewide popular vote, and GOP amendments to require one failed. That absence is the core of the “forced on us” complaint.

Was the old flag really “racist”?
+

The old seal depicted a settler plowing while a Native man rides away — imagery the designer's own family described in 1850 as displacement. Native leaders and the commission's Dakota members read it as erasure; conservatives note a 1983 revision turned the rider south and that state law later called it “Indian heritage.” Both readings are documented.

Does it look like the Somalia flag?
+

Not really. Somalia's flag is a solid light-blue field with one central five-pointed star. Minnesota's has an asymmetric two-tone field, a navy state-shape, and an eight-pointed star. Many U.S. flags share palettes with foreign flags without anyone alleging a hidden meaning.

Can cities keep flying the old flag?
+

Yes. Only the State Capitol is legally required to fly the official flag, so flying the old one violates no statute. A DFL bill (HF5077) to dock local aid from cities that do was declared dead and has no Senate companion.

Can the flag still be put to a public vote?
+

Republicans have filed bills to do exactly that, twice. But Minnesota's constitution has no citizen-referendum process, so a binding vote requires a constitutional amendment — which must pass the DFL-controlled Legislature first. It hasn't.

How much did the redesign cost?
+

About $35,000 of a $45,000 appropriation, per the Minnesota Historical Society — a fraction of, e.g., Utah's roughly $500,000 redesign.

The receipts

Polling: Star Tribune / KARE 11 / U of M Hubbard School Minnesota Poll, Mason-Dixon, June 8–10, 2026 (n=800, ±3.5) — flag, Walz approval, fraud, AI/data-center questions.
Process & law: Laws of Minnesota 2023, Ch. 62, Art. 2 (HF1830); State Emblems Redesign Commission Final Report; Minn. Stat. 1.135, 1.141; Secretary of State (official symbolism; no citizen-referendum process).
History: Minnesota Historical Society (Dakota Expulsion Act / 1863 removal); Mary Henderson Eastman, “The Seal of Minnesota” (1850); NAVA 2001 flag survey (67/72); First Amendment Encyclopedia (Confederate flag / free speech); Journal of the Civil War Era (1887 Cleveland order).
Legislation & local: HF5077 (2026); GOP vote bills (Rep. Bjorn Olson 2024 suite; Reps. Greg Davids & Marj Fogelman 2026 package); county/city resolutions (Crow Wing, Houston, Nobles, McLeod; Elk River survey; Inver Grove Heights cost).
Other states: Mississippi 2020 referendum; Utah 2024 redesign; flag-change wave (Deseret News, Session Daily).
Flag artwork: Wikimedia Commons — new flag; old flag & seal (CC BY-SA); base submission F1953 (Andrew Prekker); Capitol rotunda star photo; flag of Somalia. Attribution applied where required.

Get it in your inbox

MN06Watch documents what your representatives do — receipts, not rage. This report also runs on Substack, where you can subscribe for accountability coverage.

Subscribe ↗ More Reports