MN-06 Watch · Special Report

Where They Stand

Thirteen questions to both campaigns. Here are their answers, their records, and a side-by-side comparison for voters.

Minnesota's 6th Congressional District — Wright, Sherburne, Benton, and parts of Stearns, Anoka, Carver, and Hennepin counties — will choose between six-term incumbent Rep. Tom Emmer, the House Majority Whip, and DFL-endorsed challenger Doug Chapin, an election-law expert from Hanover, on November 3. Early voting began September 18.

Tom Emmer

Tom Emmer

Republican · Incumbent · Delano

Emmer has represented Minnesota's 6th District since 2015 and is House Majority Whip, the third-ranking Republican in the House. He served in the Minnesota House from 2005 to 2010, was the Republican nominee for governor in 2010, and is an attorney by training. He won the August 11 Republican primary over Mike Foley. His campaign and congressional office were sent this questionnaire on September 3 and September 18 and did not respond. Official congressional portrait.

0campaign answers
29from the record
4no position · platform context
3position cannot be inferred
Doug Chapin

Doug Chapin

DFL · Challenger · Hanover

Chapin is an election-law expert who led The Pew Charitable Trusts' elections team, founded electionline.org, and built the University of Minnesota Humphrey School's certificate program in election administration. He holds a law degree from Georgetown and a master's in public administration from Harvard. He won the DFL endorsement in April with 90 percent on the first ballot and the August 11 primary. He says he decided to run on Inauguration Day 2025, when the President pardoned the January 6 defendants. His campaign answered all thirteen questions on September 20. Photo provided by the campaign.

36campaign answers
0from the record
0no position · platform context
0position cannot be inferred

How to read this

MN-06 Watch sent identical questions on thirteen topics to the Chapin campaign, the Emmer campaign, and Rep. Emmer's congressional office on September 3. A follow-up went to both on September 18. The deadline was September 20. Responses are published in full, as received, below the chart. Where a campaign did not answer, we filled the cell from the public record — recorded House votes, sponsored bills, signed letters, and direct statements — and labeled it with the source. Where the record supports an inference but not a direct answer, the chart says so. We do not attribute a party-platform position to a candidate unless the candidate has adopted it. Where no individual position could be found, the cell says so and provides the relevant party-platform position as context (2024 Republican Party Platform; 2024 Democratic Party Platform; the state platform only where the national one is silent). Where the platforms are silent or conflict with each other, the cell says "Position cannot be inferred." Every cell shows its source. Every vote cites a roll-call number you can check at clerk.house.gov.

We encourage everyone to read the statements received in full.

Campaign response Summary of their response, full version below Voting record / Public statement a vote, bill, or direct quote on the exact question Inferred from record a related vote or statement, not a direct answer; the cell says what the record is No individual position · platform context no answer, no record; the party platform is shown for context only Position cannot be inferred no answer, no record, and the platforms are silent or conflict
Jump to: Cost of living & taxes · Health care · Social Security & Medicare · Immigration & ICE enforcement · Tariffs & trade · Iran & war powers · Elections & democracy · Fraud · Agriculture & farm bill · Energy · Abortion · Guns · Congressional reform

1 Cost of living & taxes

The question we asked

The 2025 reconciliation law (H.R. 1) made the 2017 individual tax rates permanent and added deductions for tips, overtime, and seniors. Would you vote to keep those provisions as they are, change them, or repeal them? Name the single federal action you would take to lower housing, grocery, or energy costs for households in the Sixth District.

What the terms mean

H.R. 1 is the budget law Congress passed in July 2025 (Republicans call it the Working Families Tax Cuts; it was introduced as the One Big Beautiful Bill). It made the 2017 tax rates permanent, added new deductions for tipped and overtime income and for people 65+, and paid for part of that with cuts to Medicaid and food assistance.

Emmer (R)
Chapin (DFL)
1a. Keep / change / repeal the H.R. 1 tax provisions
Voting record

Keep. Voted for H.R. 1 at both stages and calls it the "Working Families Tax Cuts."

Source

RC 145, May 22, 2025 (YEA, 215-214); RC 190, July 3, 2025 (AYE, 218-214). June 2, 2026 release: "$82 billion in individual relief." source ↗

Campaign response

Change. Keep the tips and overtime provisions; "repeal the law's tax breaks for billionaires and the wealthiest Americans."

Read his full answer to Q1 ↓
Source

Campaign response to MN-06 Watch questionnaire, received Sept. 20, 2026. Full text below. On record before the response (public statement): Repeal the high-income provisions. "I will vote to repeal billionaires' tax cuts so that everyone pays their fair share." — Campaign website, Issues → Taxes (updated July 28, 2026). Calls the middle-class cut "a shell game" (newsletter, June 4, 2026). source ↗

1b. Single federal action to lower housing / grocery / energy / household costs
Public statement

Housing deregulation (permitting, zoning, financing) and repeal of IRA energy-rebate programs. No grocery-price proposal found.

Source

Jan. 21, 2026 Financial Services hearing release on housing; RC 78, Feb. 25, 2026, H.R. 4758 Homeowner Energy Freedom Act (YEA). source ↗

Campaign response

Health care costs — "moving toward Medicare for All" to take "profit-driven insurance companies out of the middle."

Read his full answer to Q1 ↓
Source

Campaign response to MN-06 Watch questionnaire, received Sept. 20, 2026. Full text below. On record before the response (inferred from record): Frames costs through tariffs, energy mix (nuclear/solar/wind), and health care; no single housing or grocery proposal stated. — Jan. 10, 2026 DFL debate (KVSC): tariffs raised housing costs; nuclear, solar, wind to lower energy costs. source ↗

2 Health care

The question we asked

The enhanced ACA premium tax credits expired January 1, 2026; the House voted January 8 (H.R. 1834) on a three-year restoration. Would you vote to restore them? Would you vote to keep, modify, or repeal the Medicaid work requirements and eligibility changes in H.R. 1?

What the terms mean

ACA premium tax credits are the subsidies that lower monthly premiums for people who buy insurance on MNsure or healthcare.gov. Congress enlarged them in 2021 ("enhanced"); that enlargement expired Jan. 1, 2026. Medicaid work requirements mean adults must document work, school, or volunteering to keep Medicaid (Medical Assistance in Minnesota).

Emmer (R)
Chapin (DFL)
2a. Restore enhanced ACA premium credits
Voting record

No. Voted against the three-year restoration; calls the ACA "the unaffordable care act" and the credits an insurer bailout.

Source

RC 11, Jan. 8, 2026, H.R. 1834 (NAY; passed 230-196). RC 349, Dec. 17, 2025, H.R. 6703 GOP alternative (YEA). source ↗

Campaign response

Yes. "I would have voted to restore the enhanced ACA premium tax credits."

Read his full answer to Q2 ↓
Source

Campaign response to MN-06 Watch questionnaire, received Sept. 20, 2026. Full text below. On record before the response (public statement): Yes. Fixing health care "means extending the Affordable Care Act premium tax credits." Also backs Medicare for All or a public option. — Nov. 17, 2025 St. Cloud town hall (St. Cloud LIVE); campaign website, Issues → Health Care. source ↗

2b. Keep / modify / repeal H.R. 1 Medicaid changes
Inferred from record

Voted to enact them, twice; no direct statement on the work requirements or eligibility changes found. His Medicaid statements focus on Minnesota fraud.

Source

RC 145 / RC 190 (YEA). Mar. 3, 2026 release backing CMS deferral of MN Medicaid funds. source ↗

Campaign response

Repeal. "I would repeal the Medicaid work requirements and eligibility restrictions enacted in H.R. 1"; Medicaid "should be fully funded."

Read his full answer to Q2 ↓
Source

Campaign response to MN-06 Watch questionnaire, received Sept. 20, 2026. Full text below. On record before the response (public statement): Repeal. "I will fight to reverse Medicare and Medicaid cuts — and not just restore the lost funding but ensure that these programs are fully funded." — Campaign website, Issues → Medicare and Medicaid. source ↗

3 Social Security & Medicare

The question we asked

Do you support any change to Social Security benefits, the retirement age, or the payroll-tax cap (currently $184,500)? Would you vote to block Medicare cuts triggered under statutory PAYGO?

What the terms mean

The payroll-tax cap: Social Security tax is collected only on the first $184,500 of wages (2026); income above that is untaxed. Statutory PAYGO is a budget law that automatically cuts Medicare payments to providers if Congress passes bills that add to the deficit, unless Congress votes to waive the cut.

Emmer (R)
Chapin (DFL)
3a. Benefits / retirement age
No individual position · national platform context

No individual position found; no statement since 2023. For context, the national Republican platform says "no cuts, including no changes to the retirement age." (The state platform conflicts — it supports phasing out Social Security through private accounts.)

Source

2024 GOP Platform, Promise 14, p. 7. Last Emmer statement: Feb. 1, 2023, CBS ("off the table"). source ↗

Campaign response

No cuts, no change to the retirement age.

Read his full answer to Q3 ↓
Source

Campaign response to MN-06 Watch questionnaire, received Sept. 20, 2026. Full text below.

3b. Payroll-tax cap
Position cannot be inferred

No statement. RNC and MNGOP platforms silent.

Source

Searched emmer.house.gov, transcripts 2025–26.

Campaign response

Eliminate the cap "so that wealthy Americans contribute on all of their wages."

Read his full answer to Q3 ↓
Source

Campaign response to MN-06 Watch questionnaire, received Sept. 20, 2026. Full text below. On record before the response (public statement): Eliminate the cap. "I will fight to eliminate the cap on Social Security taxes in order to ensure that wealthy taxpayers are fully contributing." — Campaign website, Issues → Social Security; Jan. 10, 2026 debate. source ↗

3c. Block PAYGO Medicare cuts
Inferred from record

No direct statement. Voted for H.R. 1, which CBO said would trigger the Medicare sequester, and then for the Nov. 12, 2025 CR that wiped the PAYGO scorecard and averted it.

Source

RC 285, Nov. 12, 2025, H.R. 5371 (YEA). CBO PAYGO estimate 61423; OMB Jan. 29, 2026 report. source ↗

Campaign response

Yes. "I would vote to prevent statutory PAYGO from producing automatic Medicare cuts."

Read his full answer to Q3 ↓
Source

Campaign response to MN-06 Watch questionnaire, received Sept. 20, 2026. Full text below. On record before the response (public statement): Opposes the reconciliation law's Medicare cuts; "fully funded" Medicare. — Campaign website, Issues → Medicare and Medicaid; Oct. 11, 2025 forum. source ↗

4 Immigration & ICE enforcement

The question we asked

Do you support the enforcement tactics used in Operation Metro Surge in Minnesota? Should federal immigration agents be required to obtain judicial warrants, wear body cameras, and display identification? Do you support a path to citizenship for Dreamers?

What the terms mean

Operation Metro Surge was the deployment of roughly 3,000 federal immigration agents to the Twin Cities from December 2025 to February 2026 — what DHS called the largest immigration-enforcement operation ever. DHS said it was targeting immigrants with criminal records and, in Minnesota, fraud in social-service programs; the State of Minnesota sued, arguing it was being targeted for political reasons. About 4,000 people were arrested. Two U.S. citizens were killed by federal agents: Renee Good, shot by an ICE agent on January 7, and Alex Pretti, a VA nurse, shot by Border Patrol agents on January 24. The chief federal judge in Minnesota found agents had violated dozens of court orders during the operation. A judicial warrant is signed by a judge and allows entry into a home; an administrative warrant is signed by an ICE supervisor and does not. Body cameras and visible identification for agents were among the reforms Democrats demanded during the 2026 DHS funding fight. Dreamers are people brought to the U.S. as children without legal status, many covered by the DACA program.

Emmer (R)
Chapin (DFL)
4a. Operation Metro Surge tactics
Public statement

Supports. "Job well done, Tom Homan." Told the Senate the chaos was "a direct result of radical sanctuary state and city policies."

Source

Feb. 12, 2026 press release; Feb. 12, 2026 Senate HSGAC testimony (C-SPAN). source ↗

Campaign response

No. "I strongly oppose the tactics used during Operation Metro Surge. What Minnesota experienced demonstrated why Congress must exercise meaningful oversight of federal law enforcement."

Read his full answer to Q4 ↓
Source

Campaign response to MN-06 Watch questionnaire, received Sept. 20, 2026. Full text below. On record before the response (public statement): Opposes. "The federal invasion of Minnesota is an outrage." Would withhold ICE funding "even if it means a shutdown" and "dismantle ICE"; wants a federal compensation fund for Metro Surge damage. — Campaign website, Issues → ICE OUT; June 1, 2026 video interview. source ↗

4b. Judicial warrants / body cameras / ID for agents
Inferred from record

No direct answer on the three requirements. Called the Democratic reform package "comparable to mass amnesty"; voted for S. 2, the $70B ICE/CBP bill, which did not include warrant, camera, or identification requirements.

Source

RC 214, June 9, 2026, S. 2 Secure America Act (AYE, 214-212). Feb. 10, 2026 leadership stakeout. source ↗

Campaign response

Yes to body cameras and identification; judicial warrants where "constitutionally require[d]."

Read his full answer to Q4 ↓
Source

Campaign response to MN-06 Watch questionnaire, received Sept. 20, 2026. Full text below. On record before the response (inferred from record): Supports accountability and higher hiring standards; has not listed warrants/cameras/ID specifically. DFL 2026 agenda requires all three. — Jan. 10, 2026 debate (raise ICE hiring standards); Apr. 28, 2026 video ("accountability trials"). DFL Action Agenda 2026, p. 6. source ↗

4c. Path to citizenship for Dreamers
No individual position · state platform context

No individual position found; no statement or vote on Dreamers. For context, the national platform is silent and the Republican Party of Minnesota platform opposes "any program allowing illegal aliens to remain in the United States."

Source

MNGOP 2022 Platform, Sec. 10, p. 11. Related vote: RC 120, Apr. 16, 2026, Haiti TPS (NAY). source ↗

Campaign response

Yes. "Permanent protection and a path to citizenship for Dreamers."

Read his full answer to Q4 ↓
Source

Campaign response to MN-06 Watch questionnaire, received Sept. 20, 2026. Full text below.

5 Tariffs & trade

The question we asked

Should Congress reclaim its authority over tariffs — for example, by voting to end tariff emergencies as the House did on H.J.Res. 72 (February 11, 2026)? Do you support the current tariffs, and how should Congress address retaliation losses for Minnesota farmers?

What the terms mean

The Constitution gives Congress the power to set tariffs. President Trump imposed most of his tariffs under an emergency law (IEEPA) instead; on February 20, 2026, the Supreme Court ruled 6–3 in Learning Resources v. Trump that the law did not authorize them, striking down the reciprocal tariffs and the Canada, Mexico, and China tariffs. H.J.Res. 72 was the House's February 11 vote to end the emergency declaration behind the Canada tariffs. Retaliation losses are what farmers lose when other countries answer U.S. tariffs with tariffs on U.S. crops such as soybeans and corn.

Emmer (R)
Chapin (DFL)
5a. Congress reclaim tariff authority
Voting record

No. Voted for both rules blocking tariff-termination votes and against H.J.Res. 72.

Source

RC 67, Mar. 11, 2025 (AYE); RC 60, Feb. 10, 2026 (AYE; failed); RC 65, Feb. 11, 2026, H.J.Res. 72 (NAY; passed 219-211). source ↗

Campaign response

Yes. "Congress should reclaim its constitutional authority over tariffs."

Read his full answer to Q5 ↓
Source

Campaign response to MN-06 Watch questionnaire, received Sept. 20, 2026. Full text below. On record before the response (public statement): Yes. Will "fight like hell to make sure that it's Congress and not the White House that decides what tariffs are put on consumers." — Jan. 10, 2026 debate (KVSC); campaign website, Issues → The Role of Congress. source ↗

5b. Support current tariffs
Public statement

Yes. "It is a GREAT day to be an American" (Liberation Day); Trump is "the master negotiator"; sided with the dissent after SCOTUS struck the IEEPA tariffs.

Source

Apr. 2, 2025 tweet, @tomemmer (MN-06 Watch tweet archive); Feb. 21, 2026 Fox News Big Weekend Show (MN-06 Watch transcript). source ↗

Campaign response

No. Opposes "the administration's indiscriminate tariffs, which function as a tax on American consumers."

Read his full answer to Q5 ↓
Source

Campaign response to MN-06 Watch questionnaire, received Sept. 20, 2026. Full text below. On record before the response (public statement): No. Tariffs have raised housing, diesel, and fertilizer costs; "Farmers are looking at the price of diesel and fertilizer and wondering if they can even afford to plant." — Apr. 7, 2026 Bluesky post; May 2, 2026 Elk River Star News. source ↗

5c. Retaliation losses for MN farmers
Inferred from record

No statement on retaliation losses found. Has described tariff revenue as "bridge money" for farmers and voted for the budget resolution reserving $12B in agricultural assistance.

Source

Jan. 21, 2026, "What's On Your Mind" radio: "There's bridge money out there, right? The trillions that the country is bringing in on tariffs… It's bridge money." (MN-06 Watch transcript). RC 281, July 22, 2026, H.Con.Res. 113 (YEA). source ↗

Campaign response

End "unjustified tariff emergencies," pursue open markets, and "provide targeted relief when farmers suffer losses caused by federal trade policy."

Read his full answer to Q5 ↓
Source

Campaign response to MN-06 Watch questionnaire, received Sept. 20, 2026. Full text below.

6 Iran & war powers

The question we asked

Should Congress vote to authorize or to end U.S. hostilities with Iran (Operation Epic Fury)? Would you have voted for H.Con.Res. 86 (June 3, 2026)? Would you vote for the administration's supplemental war-funding request?

What the terms mean

Operation Epic Fury is the U.S. military campaign against Iran that began Feb. 28, 2026. The War Powers Resolution lets Congress vote to require the president to end hostilities that Congress has not authorized; H.Con.Res. 86 was one such vote. A supplemental is an extra spending bill outside the normal budget, in this case to fund the war.

Emmer (R)
Chapin (DFL)
6a. H.Con.Res. 86 and the other war-powers resolutions
Voting record

No, five times. Voted against every Iran war-powers resolution; called the operation "a bold, decisive, and necessary act of strength."

Source

RC 85 (Mar. 5), RC 114 (Apr. 16), RC 170 (May 14), RC 199 (June 3, H.Con.Res. 86), RC 282 (July 23) — all NAY. source ↗

Campaign response

Yes. "I oppose this war and would have supported H.Con.Res. 86."

Read his full answer to Q6 ↓
Source

Campaign response to MN-06 Watch questionnaire, received Sept. 20, 2026. Full text below. On record before the response (inferred from record): Would have voted yes (inferred). Campaign attacked Emmer's NAY as "pro-war and anti-democracy"; Chapin: Congress decides "when and where America goes to war." No first-person "I would have voted yes." — Campaign newsletter June 4, 2026 (staff-written); campaign website, Issues → The Role of Congress. source ↗

6b. Should Congress authorize?
Inferred from record

Has never said whether Congress should authorize Operation Epic Fury. Voted against every measure requiring authorization or ending hostilities under President Trump (17 roll calls, 2019–2026, including six on Iran in 2026). Voted for two War Powers withdrawal resolutions under President Biden (Syria and Somalia, 2023). In 2015 he introduced a declaration of war against ISIS, describing it as telling the president "Congress is with you."

Source

Iran: RC 85, 114, 170, 199, 282, 307 (2026), RC 7, 101 (2020) — all NAY. Yemen: RC 83, 153 (2019) NAY. Venezuela/Caribbean: RC 345, 346 (2025), RC 48 (2026) NAY. Biden era: RC 136 (Mar. 8, 2023, Syria) YEA; RC 201 (Apr. 27, 2023, Somalia) YEA; RC 172 (June 17, 2021, repeal 2002 AUMF) NAY. Nov. 19, 2015 release on H.J.Res. 73; MinnPost Nov. 20, 2015. Full table: research/emmer-warpowers.md. source ↗

Campaign response

Congress should vote — to end "unauthorized U.S. hostilities with Iran."

Read his full answer to Q6 ↓
Source

Campaign response to MN-06 Watch questionnaire, received Sept. 20, 2026. Full text below. On record before the response (public statement): Yes — Congress, not the President, decides "when and where America goes to war." — Campaign website, Issues → The Role of Congress. source ↗

6c. Supplemental war funding
Inferred from record

No direct commitment. Said Congress must "make sure the $200 billion is appropriate and necessary" and that members opposing it "are in a certain place when they're asked that question"; voted for the budget resolution reserving ~$60–70B for the war.

Source

Apr. 2, 2026, The John Fredericks Show (MN-06 Watch transcript); RC 281, July 22, 2026 (YEA). source ↗

Campaign response

No. "In no world would I support an open-ended supplemental appropriation"; funding must be tied to congressional authorization and clear objectives.

Read his full answer to Q6 ↓
Source

Campaign response to MN-06 Watch questionnaire, received Sept. 20, 2026. Full text below.

7 Elections & democracy

The question we asked

Do you support the SAVE America Act's documentary proof-of-citizenship requirement for voter registration? Should Minnesota turn its voter rolls over to the Department of Justice? Do you support or oppose the January 2025 pardons of January 6 defendants?

What the terms mean

Requiring photo ID to vote is broadly popular — about 80 percent in national polls. The SAVE America Act goes further: it would require documents proving citizenship (a passport or birth certificate) to register, impose criminal penalties on election officials who register someone without them, and let private citizens sue officials. Supporters say documentary proof is the only way to be sure non-citizens are not registering; opponents say non-citizen voting is already illegal and rare, and that millions of eligible citizens lack ready access to those documents. Polling varies sharply depending on how the proposal is described: a March 2026 CBS/YouGov poll asking about the SAVE America Act by name found 28 percent support, 31 percent opposition, and 41 percent unsure, while other polls describing some or all of its provisions have found substantially higher support. MN-06 Watch's interactive explainer walks through every provision: mn06watch.com/articles/save-act-explainer. Voter rolls are the state's list of registered voters, including Social Security and driver's license numbers. The January 6 pardons were President Trump's January 20, 2025 unconditional pardons of roughly 1,500 people charged in the Capitol attack, including those convicted of assaulting police; some recipients have since argued in court that the pardon also covers unrelated charges, such as weapons found during January 6 searches, and courts have split on that question.

Emmer (R)
Chapin (DFL)
7a. SAVE America Act
Voting record

Supports. Original cosponsor of H.R. 22; voted for it in 2025 and 2026.

Source

Cosponsor Jan. 7, 2025; RC 102, Apr. 10, 2025 (YEA); RC 69, Feb. 11, 2026 (YEA). source ↗

Campaign response

Opposes the proof-of-citizenship requirement, the criminal penalties for election officials, and the private right of action. Verification should be "accurate, secure" and not block eligible citizens.

Read his full answer to Q7 ↓
Source

Campaign response to MN-06 Watch questionnaire, received Sept. 20, 2026. Full text below. On record before the response (public statement): Opposes. Running "not to make it harder for eligible Americans to vote"; podcast framing: the requirement is "designed to create barriers." Note: the campaign newsletter's own text is hedged ("reasonable people can disagree"). — Campaign newsletter July 9, 2026; Politics Chicks podcast Feb. 19, 2026 (show notes). DFL Action Agenda 2026, p. 10, opposes. source ↗

7b. Minnesota voter rolls to DOJ
Public statement

Yes. "If you have nothing to hide, why wouldn't you just provide those voting rolls?" Cosponsored the Minnesota Voter Integrity Act conditioning HAVA funds on turnover.

Source

Apr. 15, 2026, Fox Business Mornings with Maria (MN-06 Watch transcript); Feb. 2, 2026 press release on H.R. 7320. source ↗

Campaign response

No — not "absent a lawful, legitimate and appropriately limited purpose."

Read his full answer to Q7 ↓
Source

Campaign response to MN-06 Watch questionnaire, received Sept. 20, 2026. Full text below. On record before the response (public statement): No. "Any opportunity we have not to turn over personally identifiable information to somebody who doesn't need to have it is an opportunity we need to take." — Apr. 28, 2026 video interview (campaign Substack transcript). source ↗

7c. January 6 pardons
Public statement

Defended them as ending "weaponization," while saying "people who committed crimes should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law."

Source

Jan. 21, 2025, ABC News Live with Linsey Davis: "people who committed crimes should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law and not beyond that. And what they did is they went too far." (MN-06 Watch transcript) source ↗

Campaign response

Opposes. The pardons were "one of the events that motivated me to run for Congress."

Read his full answer to Q7 ↓
Source

Campaign response to MN-06 Watch questionnaire, received Sept. 20, 2026. Full text below. On record before the response (public statement): Opposes — the pardons are why he is running. "I decided to run for Congress in January 2025 when the President pardoned the January 6 rioters." — MN-06 Watch survey, March 2026. source ↗

8 Fraud

The question we asked

What specific federal action should Congress take in response to the Feeding Our Future, autism-services, and Housing Stabilization Services fraud cases in Minnesota? Do you support CMS withholding Minnesota Medicaid funds during its review? What, if anything, should be done about prosecutor staffing at the U.S. Attorney's Office for Minnesota?

What the terms mean

Feeding Our Future, autism services, and Housing Stabilization Services are three Minnesota cases in which federally funded programs were billed for services never provided; more than 60 people have been convicted in the Feeding Our Future case alone. CMS is the federal agency that pays the federal share of Medicaid; in 2026 it withheld about $199 million from Minnesota during a review. The U.S. Attorney's Office is the federal prosecutor for Minnesota. In early 2026 it lost most of its prosecutors: the four attorneys leading the Feeding Our Future case, including acting U.S. Attorney Joe Thompson, resigned after the Justice Department pressed the office to investigate the widow of Renee Good, and CBS News reported the office fell from about 70 assistant U.S. attorneys to as few as 17.

Emmer (R)
Chapin (DFL)
8a. Federal action on the Minnesota cases
Voting record

Sponsors the SCAM Act (denaturalization for fraud convictions); co-introduced the FRAUD Act (state reporting mandate); voted for the Deporting Fraudsters Act; questioned Walz and Ellison at Oversight; demanded both resign.

Source

H.R. 7156 (Jan. 20, 2026); FRAUD Act release July 2, 2026; Oversight hearings Jan. 7 and Mar. 4, 2026 (official transcripts); June 10, 2026 letter. source ↗

Campaign response

Investigate, prosecute, recover; "strengthen federal-state data sharing, auditing and program-integrity systems" to catch billing patterns earlier.

Read his full answer to Q8 ↓
Source

Campaign response to MN-06 Watch questionnaire, received Sept. 20, 2026. Full text below. On record before the response (inferred from record): "Fraud should be investigated… People who steal public money should be held accountable. But allegations are not evidence." No specific federal proposal; has not named the cases. — Campaign newsletter July 23 and June 11, 2026 (staff-written); Sept. 3, 2026 newsletter acknowledges voters raising fraud. source ↗

8b. CMS withholding MN Medicaid funds
Public statement

Supports. Joined the MN GOP delegation demanding Walz "comply with" CMS.

Source

Mar. 3, 2026 press release (title verified; body not fetched). source ↗

Campaign response

No. Opposes "indiscriminately withholding Medicaid funding"; CMS should fix vulnerabilities and recover payments "without punishing patients."

Read his full answer to Q8 ↓
Source

Campaign response to MN-06 Watch questionnaire, received Sept. 20, 2026. Full text below. On record before the response (public statement): Opposes without evidence. "Withholding health care funding from an entire state should require more than a press conference and a suspicion… prove its case or release the funds." — Campaign newsletter July 23, 2026 (staff-written; campaign position). source ↗

8c. U.S. Attorney's Office staffing
Position cannot be inferred

No statement found on the collapse from ~70 to ~17 AUSAs or the resignation of the four lead Feeding Our Future prosecutors. Hosted a May 8, 2026 roundtable with U.S. Attorney Rosen; release does not mention staffing.

Source

Searched emmer.house.gov, majoritywhip.gov, transcripts Jan.–Aug. 2026. CBS, Star Tribune on staffing. source ↗

Campaign response

Fully staff it. "Fighting fraud requires investigators and prosecutors, not political talking points."

Read his full answer to Q8 ↓
Source

Campaign response to MN-06 Watch questionnaire, received Sept. 20, 2026. Full text below.

9 Agriculture & farm bill

The question we asked

Would you have voted for the House farm bill (H.R. 7567, April 30, 2026)? Do you support permanent year-round E15? What changes, if any, to H-2A or farm-labor rules do you support?

What the terms mean

The farm bill is the five-year law covering crop insurance, commodity supports, conservation, and SNAP (food stamps). E15 is gasoline with 15% ethanol, made largely from Minnesota corn; federal rules have limited summer sales. H-2A is the visa program for temporary farm workers.

Emmer (R)
Chapin (DFL)
9a. House farm bill (H.R. 7567)
Voting record

Yes. Voted for it and hosted a Chanhassen farm-bill roundtable the next week.

Source

RC 154, Apr. 30, 2026 (YEA, 224-200); May 7, 2026 release. source ↗

Campaign response

Did not say yes or no. "I would evaluate H.R. 7567 against those priorities rather than treating the farm bill as a partisan vehicle." Wants "a predictable, bipartisan farm bill" with a safety net, crop insurance, conservation, and nutrition programs.

Read his full answer to Q9 ↓
Source

Campaign response to MN-06 Watch questionnaire, received Sept. 20, 2026. Full text below.

9b. Permanent year-round E15
Voting record

Yes. Voted for H.R. 1346; Minnesota Corn Growers credited his "leadership."

Source

RC 164, May 13, 2026 (YEA, 218-203); Fischbach release quoting MCGA. source ↗

Campaign response

Yes. "I support permanent year-round E15."

Read his full answer to Q9 ↓
Source

Campaign response to MN-06 Watch questionnaire, received Sept. 20, 2026. Full text below.

9c. H-2A / farm labor
Position cannot be inferred

Nothing since 2021: "border and labor are related. You have to have a coherent immigration policy, and quite frankly, we don't have one." National and state platforms silent.

Source

Aug. 4, 2021, Brownfield Ag Radio at Farmfest (MN-06 Watch transcript). source ↗

Campaign response

Reform H-2A: "faster and more predictable processing for employers, strong protections against exploitation."

Read his full answer to Q9 ↓
Source

Campaign response to MN-06 Watch questionnaire, received Sept. 20, 2026. Full text below.

10 Energy

The question we asked

Do you support the NRC's relicensing of the Monticello nuclear plant through 2050? Who should bear the cost of new generation and transmission needed for hyperscale data centers proposed in the district (Becker, Monticello, Elk River) — ratepayers or developers? Would you vote to restore the clean-energy tax credits repealed in H.R. 1, or keep them repealed?

What the terms mean

The Monticello plant is Xcel Energy's nuclear plant in the district; the NRC (the federal nuclear regulator) approved running it to 2050. Hyperscale data centers are the very large computing facilities proposed in Becker, Monticello, and Elk River; they need new power plants and transmission lines, and the question is whether households or the developers pay for those. H.R. 1 repealed most of the clean-energy tax credits from the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act.

Emmer (R)
Chapin (DFL)
10a. Monticello relicensing
No individual position · national platform context

No individual position found on the relicensing. For context, the national Republican platform calls for energy "from all sources, including nuclear."

Source

2024 GOP Platform, Ch. 1, p. 11. Searched emmer.house.gov, transcripts 2024–26. source ↗

Campaign response

Supports nuclear "when independent regulators determine it can operate safely"; wants a new wave of "smaller and safer nuclear plants."

Read his full answer to Q10 ↓
Source

Campaign response to MN-06 Watch questionnaire, received Sept. 20, 2026. Full text below. On record before the response (inferred from record): Supports nuclear as part of the mix (inferred). "He believes in nuclear power, solar farms, and wind farms." Note: the DFL Ongoing Platform opposes nuclear — his record overrides the platform here. — Jan. 10, 2026 debate (KVSC, reporter paraphrase). source ↗

10b. Data-center costs: ratepayers vs. developers
Voting record

Voted for the Ratepayer Protection Act, which directs state regulators to consider making large loads (100 MW+) pay "the full, incremental cost" of the generation and grid upgrades they require. On the district projects, his stated view is local control and more information: "I have a city in my district who had a hearing on a data center… people have to understand what this really is… if Congress gets in the way, guess what? More bureaucratic red tape from government does what? It slows and eventually stops innovation." Has not said who should pay.

Source

RC 312, Sept. 16, 2026, H.R. 9340 (YEA, 417-3). Aug. 28, 2026, Fox Business "Kudlow" (MN-06 Watch transcript). No statement on the Elk River, Monticello, or Becker proposals by name. source ↗

Campaign response

Developers. "Residential customers should not see their electric bills rise because a hyperscale data center requires new generation, substations or transmission."

Read his full answer to Q10 ↓
Source

Campaign response to MN-06 Watch questionnaire, received Sept. 20, 2026. Full text below. On record before the response (inferred from record): Has flagged data-center energy and water demands in Monticello and Becker and local zoning as a tool; no cost-allocation position. DFL 2026: hyperscale moratorium. — Politics Chicks podcast Feb. 19, 2026 (show notes); Apr. 28, 2026 video. DFL Action Agenda 2026, p. 2. source ↗

10c. Restore or keep repealed the IRA clean-energy credits
Voting record

Keep repealed. Voted for H.R. 1 (phase-outs) and for H.R. 4758 repealing home-efficiency rebates ("the Democrats' Green New Scam").

Source

RC 145 / RC 190; RC 78, Feb. 25, 2026 (YEA). source ↗

Campaign response

Restore. "I would support restoring effective clean-energy incentives eliminated by H.R. 1."

Read his full answer to Q10 ↓
Source

Campaign response to MN-06 Watch questionnaire, received Sept. 20, 2026. Full text below. On record before the response (inferred from record): Restore (inferred). Will "resist any effort to halt the transition away from… fossil fuels" and rejoin Paris; no statement on the credits by name. — Campaign website, Issues → Fighting Climate Change. source ↗

11 Abortion

The question we asked

Should abortion law be set by Congress or by the states? Would you vote for a federal restriction at any stage of pregnancy, or for legislation codifying Roe? Should mifepristone remain available under the FDA's current rules?

What the terms mean

Since the 2022 Dobbs decision, abortion law is set state by state unless Congress passes a national law. Codifying Roe means passing a federal law guaranteeing the abortion access Roe v. Wade provided. Mifepristone is the first of the two pills used in medication abortion; FDA rules since 2023 allow it by mail and telehealth.

Emmer (R)
Chapin (DFL)
11a. Congress or states
Inferred from record

Says states. "The decision to defend it should remain with the states" (2022). Was an original cosponsor of the federal Life at Conception Act in five consecutive Congresses through 2024; not a cosponsor of the current version.

Source

MN Reformer Sept. 22, 2022; GovTrack cosponsor lists H.R. 431 (118th) through H.R. 816 (114th); not on H.R. 722 (119th). source ↗

Campaign response

Congress — federal legislation "protecting reproductive rights nationwide"; would oppose a federal ban.

Read his full answer to Q11 ↓
Source

Campaign response to MN-06 Watch questionnaire, received Sept. 20, 2026. Full text below. On record before the response (public statement): Congress should codify Roe. "I support full reproductive rights." — Campaign website, Issues; Oct. 11, 2025 forum (St. Cloud LIVE). source ↗

11b. Federal restriction at any stage
Voting record

Voted for the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act and TANF funds for pregnancy centers; SBA Pro-Life America A+. No position on a 15-week bill found.

Source

RC 27, Jan. 23, 2025, H.R. 21 (YEA); RC 37, Jan. 21, 2026, H.R. 6945 (YEA). source ↗

Campaign response

No restriction; would codify Roe.

Read his full answer to Q11 ↓
Source

Campaign response to MN-06 Watch questionnaire, received Sept. 20, 2026. Full text below. On record before the response (inferred from record): None (inferred). Decisions are "purely a matter between a woman and her medical providers." — Campaign website, Issues. source ↗

11c. Mifepristone
Voting record

Signed, as Majority Whip, a Nov. 2025 letter asking HHS and FDA to "immediately reinstate the REMS requiring in-person dispensing of mifepristone," and a May 2026 Supreme Court brief arguing the Comstock Act makes abortion drugs "nonmailable." No statement in his own words.

Source

Nov. 20, 2025 Smith/Harshbarger letter to Kennedy and Makary, 175 signers, signature block p. 4 ("Tom Emmer, Majority Whip"); May 7, 2026 amicus brief of 113 members, Danco v. Louisiana, Nos. 25A1207/25A1208, appendix ("Majority Whip Tom Emmer (MN)"). source ↗

Campaign response

Yes. "Mifepristone should remain available under the FDA's science-based rules."

Read his full answer to Q11 ↓
Source

Campaign response to MN-06 Watch questionnaire, received Sept. 20, 2026. Full text below.

12 Guns

The question we asked

Do you support universal background checks, a federal assault-weapons ban, a national red-flag law, or national concealed-carry reciprocity? What federal legislation, if any, do you support in response to the Annunciation church shooting?

What the terms mean

Universal background checks would extend the checks licensed dealers run to private and online sales. A red-flag (extreme-risk) law lets a court temporarily remove guns from someone found dangerous; Minnesota has one. Concealed-carry reciprocity would require every state to honor every other state's carry permits. The Annunciation shooting was the Aug. 27, 2025 attack on a Minneapolis Catholic school Mass.

Emmer (R)
Chapin (DFL)
12a. Background checks / assault weapons / red flag / reciprocity
Voting record

Opposes new federal restrictions: voted against the 2022 Bipartisan Safer Communities Act; sponsors a bill easing NICS-denial challenges; cosponsored concealed-carry reciprocity (118th). Gun Owners of America A-.

Source

RC 299 (117th), June 24, 2022, S. 2938 (NAY); H.R. 2184 (sponsor); H.R. 38 (118th) cosponsor. source ↗

Campaign response

Supports universal background checks, a federal assault-weapons ban, and red-flag laws "with appropriate due-process safeguards"; opposes national concealed-carry reciprocity.

Read his full answer to Q12 ↓
Source

Campaign response to MN-06 Watch questionnaire, received Sept. 20, 2026. Full text below. On record before the response (public statement): Assault-weapons ban: yes — "mass killing machines… I will fight to keep them off of our streets." Defends lawful ownership for hunting and self-protection. Background checks / red flag: not stated (DNC platform supports both). — Campaign website, Issues → Guns and the 2nd Amendment; newsletter May 7, 2026 ("As Doug shared"). source ↗

12b. Federal legislation after Annunciation
Public statement

None proposed. Said the shooter "never should have had access" to a firearm and pointed to Minnesota's existing red-flag law; asked why he voted against the 2022 law: "I don't remember the reasons."

Source

Aug. 31, 2025, ABC This Week (ABC transcript). source ↗

Campaign response

Strengthen background checks, limit assault-style weapons and high-capacity magazines, help states implement extreme-risk laws.

Read his full answer to Q12 ↓
Source

Campaign response to MN-06 Watch questionnaire, received Sept. 20, 2026. Full text below.

13 Congressional reform

The question we asked

Do you support term limits for members of Congress? Do you support a ban on members trading individual stocks — and is the Stop Insider Trading Act the House passed July 22, 2026 (H.R. 7008) sufficient? How many in-person, open-to-the-public town halls will you commit to holding each year?

What the terms mean

The Stop Insider Trading Act (H.R. 7008) bans members of Congress from buying individual stocks but lets them keep stocks they already own. A telephone town hall is a call-in event the office schedules and screens; an in-person town hall is a public meeting anyone can attend and speak at.

Emmer (R)
Chapin (DFL)
13a. Term limits
No individual position · state platform context

No individual position found; not a cosponsor of any term-limits amendment and no pledge found. For context, the national platform is silent and the Republican Party of Minnesota platform supports "term limits for all elected officials."

Source

MNGOP 2022 Platform, Sec. 9, p. 10. GovTrack: not a cosponsor of H.J.Res. 5 (119th) or H.J.Res. 11 (118th). source ↗

Campaign response

Does not endorse a statutory limit ("less on an arbitrary term limit than on making members of Congress accountable"), but pledges to self-limit: "do not intend to run for re-election after four terms."

Read his full answer to Q13 ↓
Source

Campaign response to MN-06 Watch questionnaire, received Sept. 20, 2026. Full text below.

13b. Stock-trading ban / is H.R. 7008 sufficient
Voting record

Voted for the Stop Insider Trading Act (bans new purchases, allows existing holdings). Not a cosponsor; did not sign the Restore Trust in Congress discharge petition.

Source

RC 280, July 22, 2026, H.R. 7008 (YEA, 232-198). GovTrack cosponsor list. source ↗

Campaign response

Yes. Would strengthen H.R. 7008 so it "cannot be evaded through spouses, dependent children, trusts or other arrangements."

Read his full answer to Q13 ↓
Source

Campaign response to MN-06 Watch questionnaire, received Sept. 20, 2026. Full text below.

13c. In-person town halls per year
Public statement

No commitment. Last in-person town hall: Aug. 21, 2023, Lexington City Hall, Circle Pines (confirmed in Lexington City Council minutes); Big Lake Aug. 7 and Hamburg Aug. 16, 2023 preceded it. Telephone town halls since. Of a 2025 protest in his district: "at five o'clock it was like they all punched out."

Source

Emmer release Aug. 18, 2023; City of Lexington council minutes, Sept. 7, 2023, item 9 ("the town hall meeting that Congressman Tom Emmers sponsored"); Star Tribune Aug. 7, 2023 (Big Lake); Aug. 2, 2025 Fox Report (MN-06 Watch transcript). source ↗

Campaign response

"Regular, open-to-the-public town halls" — no number given in the response. (March 2026 survey: "at least monthly.")

Read his full answer to Q13 ↓
Source

Campaign response to MN-06 Watch questionnaire, received Sept. 20, 2026. Full text below. Number from MN-06 Watch survey, March 2026. On record before the response (public statement): At least monthly. "Regular (at least monthly) opportunities for me personally to face the voters — ideally in-person." Has held 15+ as a candidate. — MN-06 Watch survey, March 2026; campaign newsletter Aug. 20 and Sept. 3, 2026. source ↗

The full responses, as received

Doug Chapin (DFL — Hanover)

Questionnaire sent September 3. Follow-up September 18. Response received September 20. Answers published as received; question headings shortened.

1. Cost of living and taxes.

I would change H.R. 1. I support tax relief that actually helps working families, including provisions benefiting workers who earn tips and overtime, but I would repeal the law's tax breaks for billionaires and the wealthiest Americans. Our tax code should reward work, not wealth.

If I could take one federal action to lower household costs in the Sixth District, I would tackle health care costs by moving toward Medicare for All. Premiums, deductibles, prescription drugs and medical debt consume an enormous share of family budgets. Taking profit-driven insurance companies out of the middle would put money directly back into families' pockets.

2. Health care.

Yes. I would have voted to restore the enhanced ACA premium tax credits rather than allow families to face sharply higher premiums while Congress works toward broader reform.

I would repeal the Medicaid work requirements and eligibility restrictions enacted in H.R. 1. Health care should not depend on navigating additional paperwork or proving that you are sufficiently deserving of care. My position is broader than simply reversing those cuts: Medicaid should be fully funded, and I support moving toward a Medicare for All system that guarantees health care to every American.

3. Social Security and Medicare.

I do not support cutting Social Security benefits or raising the retirement age. I support eliminating the Social Security payroll-tax cap, currently $184,500, so that wealthy Americans contribute on all of their wages just as working people do. That would strengthen Social Security without asking working Americans to work longer or accept smaller benefits.

Yes, I would vote to prevent statutory PAYGO from producing automatic Medicare cuts. I have committed to protecting and fully funding Medicare, not reducing it.

4. Immigration and ICE enforcement.

No. I strongly oppose the tactics used during Operation Metro Surge. What Minnesota experienced demonstrated why Congress must exercise meaningful oversight of federal law enforcement and why ICE needs to be dismantled. We must rebuild federal immigration enforcement around constitutional rights, accountability and the rule of law.

Federal immigration agents should be identifiable and accountable for their actions, including through body cameras. Americans should not have to guess who armed federal agents are or whether they can be held responsible for their conduct. Enforcement actions that constitutionally require a judicial warrant should have one.

I support comprehensive immigration reform with a straightforward path to citizenship, including permanent protection and a path to citizenship for Dreamers.

5. Tariffs and trade.

Yes. Congress should reclaim its constitutional authority over tariffs. I have repeatedly said that Congress has surrendered too much of its responsibility over taxes, spending, tariffs and war to the executive branch. Tariffs should not be imposed indefinitely by presidential decree.

I oppose the administration's indiscriminate tariffs, which function as a tax on American consumers and expose Minnesota farmers to retaliation. Congress should end unjustified tariff emergencies, pursue stable and open markets for Minnesota agricultural products, and provide targeted relief when farmers suffer losses caused by federal trade policy—not force farm families to absorb the cost of Washington's decisions.

6. Iran and war powers.

Congress should vote to end unauthorized U.S. hostilities with Iran. I oppose this war and would have supported H.Con.Res. 86. The Constitution gives Congress—not the president—the power to decide whether this country goes to war. Congress cannot continue surrendering that responsibility whenever it becomes politically inconvenient. My campaign has specifically identified decisions about "when and where America goes to war" as a power Congress must reclaim.

In no world would I support an open-ended supplemental appropriation that enables the administration to continue an unauthorized war. Any military funding request should be tied to a lawful mission, congressional authorization, clear objectives, and meaningful congressional oversight.

7. Elections and democracy.

I oppose the SAVE Act's documentary proof-of-citizenship requirement. I also oppose criminalizing election officials for registering eligible voters who have not produced the prescribed documents and creating new private lawsuits against administrators simply for doing their jobs. Citizenship verification should be accurate, secure and designed so eligible American citizens are not prevented from voting because they lack a particular document.

Minnesota should protect voter information and should not simply turn over its voter rolls to the Department of Justice absent a lawful, legitimate and appropriately limited purpose.

I oppose the January 2025 pardons of January 6 defendants. In fact, President Trump's decision to pardon January 6 defendants was one of the events that motivated me to run for Congress. I have spent nearly four decades working on American elections. Political violence intended to overturn an election must have consequences.

8. Fraud.

Fraud involving public programs should be investigated aggressively, prosecuted when the evidence supports prosecution, and followed by efforts to recover stolen taxpayer money. Congress should strengthen federal-state data sharing, auditing and program-integrity systems so suspicious billing patterns can be identified before hundreds of millions of dollars leave the door.

I do not support using legitimate concerns about fraud as justification for indiscriminately withholding Medicaid funding that pays for health care for Minnesotans who had nothing to do with the misconduct. CMS should work with Minnesota to correct demonstrated vulnerabilities and recover improper payments without punishing patients.

The U.S. Attorney's Office should have the prosecutors, investigators and support staff necessary to pursue complex fraud cases promptly and effectively. Fighting fraud requires investigators and prosecutors, not political talking points.

9. Agriculture and the farm bill.

Agriculture is essential to the Sixth District, and farmers need a predictable, bipartisan farm bill that provides a strong safety net, conservation support, crop insurance, nutrition programs and opportunities to reach new markets. I would evaluate H.R. 7567 against those priorities rather than treating the farm bill as a partisan vehicle.

I support permanent year-round E15. Minnesota farmers and biofuel producers should have the certainty of a permanent national standard rather than waiting for temporary waivers every year.

On agricultural labor, we need an H-2A system that works for both producers and workers: faster and more predictable processing for employers, strong protections against exploitation, and a legal agricultural workforce that gives farms certainty instead of forcing them to navigate an unnecessarily cumbersome immigration system. That fits my broader commitment to immigration reform that reduces the time, cost and red tape of legal immigration.

10. Energy.

I support maintaining reliable carbon-free generation when independent regulators determine it can operate safely. The NRC's decision regarding Monticello should therefore be driven by rigorous safety and environmental review, not ideology. That said, as the son of a nuclear engineer, I support the use of nuclear energy as an alternative to fossil fuels and will work to restart the nation's permitting and licensing process for a new wave of smaller and safer nuclear plants.

On data centers, my position is straightforward: developers should pay the infrastructure costs their projects create. Residential customers should not see their electric bills rise because a hyperscale data center requires new generation, substations or transmission. I support comprehensive environmental and infrastructure review of these projects and Minnesota's approach of assigning the electrical infrastructure costs needed to serve them to developers rather than residential ratepayers.

I would support restoring effective clean-energy incentives eliminated by H.R. 1. Climate change is real, and the United States should accelerate, not obtusely obstruct, the transition toward renewable and carbon-free energy.

11. Abortion.

Reproductive health-care decisions should be made by patients and their medical providers, not politicians in Washington or state capitols. I support federal legislation protecting reproductive rights nationwide and would oppose a federal abortion ban.

I would support legislation codifying the protections previously recognized under Roe v. Wade. Mifepristone should remain available under the FDA's science-based rules, and politicians should not substitute their judgment for the agency's medical and scientific review.

12. Guns.

I support the right of law-abiding Americans to own firearms for hunting and self-defense. I also support federal action to keep assault-style weapons off our streets. Those positions are not contradictory: Minnesota has a proud tradition of responsible gun ownership, and responsible gun owners understand that weapons designed to inflict mass casualties present a different public-safety challenge.

I support universal background checks, a federal assault-weapons ban and effective extreme-risk protections with appropriate due-process safeguards. I do not support federal concealed-carry reciprocity that overrides Minnesota's ability to establish its own permitting and safety standards.

After Annunciation, Congress should stop treating mass shootings as unavoidable. I would support legislation strengthening background checks, limiting access to assault-style weapons and high-capacity magazines, and helping states implement effective extreme-risk laws and violence-prevention programs.

13. Congressional reform.

My focus is less on an arbitrary term limit than on making members of Congress accountable to the people they represent. Congress has become too insulated from voters and too responsive to wealthy and powerful interests. I support reforms that increase accountability, competition and representation, including expanding the House so congressional districts are smaller and representatives are closer to their constituents. I am committing to self-limiting and do not intend to run for re-election after four terms. My goal is to flip and hold this district and then hand it off to a younger Member of Congress.

I support banning members of Congress from trading individual stocks. Members should not be able to use information or influence they acquire through public service for personal financial gain. I would support strengthening H.R. 7008 where necessary to ensure the prohibition is comprehensive, enforceable and cannot be evaded through spouses, dependent children, trusts or other arrangements.

I will commit to holding regular, open-to-the-public town halls. A member of Congress should show up, look constituents in the eye and answer their questions, including when those questions are difficult. That is the kind of representative I intend to be.

Tom Emmer (Republican — Incumbent)

Questionnaire sent September 3 · Follow-up September 18 · No response received.

Rep. Emmer's campaign and congressional office were sent the same thirteen questions on September 3 and September 18, through the campaign's public email ([email protected]), the congressional office's press secretary, and the official contact form at emmer.house.gov. No response was received by the September 20 deadline. Any response received after publication will be added here, with the date noted, and the chart updated to reflect it.

Keep going

Everything on this page comes from the same public record MN-06 Watch tracks every day. The tools: